May 24, 2013

Building Background Knowledge: Harnessing the Power of the Internet

spider web

 

 

In yesterday’s post, Building Background Knowledge: Who’s Doing the Work?, we shared a story of fifth grade students working with Cyrus Cassells’s “Soul Make a Path Through Shining,” a sophisticated poem about the Civil Rights Movement. Containing words like “minotaur,” “hydra-headed,” and “maelstrom” the difficult vocabulary presented itself as the most obvious obstacle to understanding the poem prompting the fifth graders to collectively share their knowledge of the hard words and look up others words they did not know. What we did not share yesterday, however, was that while this contributed to clearing up some confusion, most students did not emerge with a crystal clear understanding of the poem.  They still felt like there were gaps in their understanding which meant that yet again, they were faced with a decision: Do I say “oh well” and call it good enough? Or do I continue to work to figure it out?

In fifth grade, informational reading standard seven requires that students “draw on information from multiple print or digital sources, demonstrating the ability to locate an answer to a question quickly or to solve a problem efficiently.” We have affectionately dubbed this  “The Multi Media Standard”  and are particularly drawn to the words “locate an answer to a question or to solve a problem efficiently.”

Yesterday we shared that the students thought of dictionary.com as a potential resource for solving the problem of lack of word knowledge. Surely, typing in a word and having the definition pop up is efficient. However, while lack of word knowledge was the only problem these children could identify, it was not the only problem these students faced. The other part of the problem was understanding the bigger context of the poem which required knowing about Elizabeth Eckford and her first day of school at Little Rock Central High School on September 4, 1957. But when Kim asked students what they might google in order to find additional information to help them construct greater meaning about this text, the students perseverated on words. In their minds, the best solution to figuring out this puzzle was making sure they knew every word in the poem.

As teachers, one of the daily dilemmas of our jobs is knowing when to let inquiry guide student learning and when to intervene with direct, explicit instruction. In this case, students needed  to be taught how to further mine text for keywords that would assist their Google search for information to help them more thoroughly understand what they were reading. They needed to pay attention to the title of the poem and learn more about the poet.  They needed the bit of introductory text that explained that Cassells wrote this poem after being inspired by the documentary Eyes on the Prize. And they needed a teacher to help them see their needs.

While many of our Common Core aligned lessons have students reading closely and carefully to cite evidence and make logical inferences, we can say that only a few have paid attention to standard number seven and the ways in which digital resources need to support students’ meaning making processes. As you consider ways to build background knowledge, we ask you to think about whether you, like us, have adequately addressed standard number seven and taught students to harness the power of the Internet. And as always, we ask you to share with us what you have done to support this effort!

Pass the Salt!

During our institute on Friday, The Common Core Literacy Block: What Will It Look Like in my Classroom?,  fifth-grade teacher Mary Lee Hahn from Dublin Public Schools in Ohio presented two sessions which featured some of the latest and greatest children’s literature in poetry and non-fiction. Because we were leading our own session about figuring out how to fit read aloud, shared reading, writing, small group one-on-one instruction, etc. into the literacy block, we weren’t able to attend Mary Lee’s session on poetry, but we sat mesmerized as she shared some of her new favorite titles for non-fiction with the whole group.

When she spoke about titles like A is for Musk Ox, It’s All About Me-Ow, A Place for Turtles, and Timeless Thomas: How Thomas Edison Changed our Lives , she discussed text features and the way in which authors had included tools, such as timelines or combinations of simple text in support of more complex passages.  She shared books on a wide array of topics and when it was over, most of us felt an urgency to buy new non-fiction books.

On our way to dinner, Mary Lee sheepishly shared that after her session, one of our participants told her that she provided “just the right information about the book to get her interested” and called her a “master of salting.”

In order to get books into the hands of children, they need to know what’s out there. They need to know about great authors and titles and unless we speak to children with the same enthusiasm and passion that Mary Lee spoke to us, many great stories will go unread. When we think about “fitting it all in” one of the important pieces that we remind ourselves to include is book talk. Part of our jobs as teachers is to enhance the flavor of our readers’ diets. How can we do that? We can all work to share a blurb or excerpt or a bit of information about an author or an illustrator with our students every single day (and when we get good at it, begin to do it several times a day!).

The key to independence and proficiency rests with great texts, which means there is a call for us all to become “masters of salting.”  So, today, we’ll end by thanking Mary Lee for acting as our model salter and by asking you, “What great books have you read lately?”

Is There Enough Joy in This Learning?

This week we are blogging about children’s literature and read aloud as they relate to the Common Core State Standards. We begin the week with Molly Bang.


This past weekend, Molly Bang was a keynote speaker at the 44th Annual Conference on Children’s Literature at the University of Georgia. Molly has a new series of non-fiction, picture books about light. She wrote the books with scientist Penny Chisholm and explains, “… we wanted children to get a sense of the awe we feel as we learn about how life works.” So they made awe their their guiding how statement for each book in the series. How would they communicate the workings of photosynthesis? Through awe and wonder. How would they explain the way light supports life in the darkest depths of the ocean? Through awe and wonder.

Throughout the process of writing, illustrating, and publishing the book, they asked themselves, Is this awe and wonder? Is it enough awe and wonder?

At one point, Molly and Penny were going back and forth with a particular illustration. Penny would suggest a revision and Molly would try to get closer to the ideal for which they were struggling. After three different versions of the image of animals stuck in green muck, they simultaneously realized, This isn’t awe and wonder. So they realigned with their original purpose, checking in with each illustration in each text. They searched for the awe and wonder in the science and then worked to communicate it in ways that gave teachers and students that same sense of awe and wonder.

The value of Molly and Penny’s books as non-fiction texts is obvious, particularly with the the Common Core’s attention to non-fiction reading. We see another connection between Molly’s sunlight series and the CCSS, however. The way Molly and Penny worked to make the what of their books match the how of their intentions reminds us of the way we want to cling to joy in the classroom as we think about what we need to teach within the Common Core. Just as Molly and Penny found themselves saying, Wait a minute, what happened to the awe and wonder?, we want to help educators continually check in with themselves and ask, Is there joy in this learning? Is there enough joy in this learning?


   

More Than Sparkly

Screen shot 2013-02-17 at 6.05.56 PM

 

Hello again, readers!  After two weeks of curating our previous posts and putting them together in ways that allow people to access similar topics easily, we are excited to get back to our regular blogging! :)

As we were busy creating digests of our posts, we heard from one of our readers, Patti Austin, a second grade teacher from Islip, New York on the topic of close reading.

She shared that, “ I remember thinking when I first learned about close read…give me a break 4 or 5 days on the same passage, they’ll hate that.  Boy was I wrong!!”

In her very excited email, Patti went on to tell us that she introduced close reading to students by placing her diamond engagement ring under the document camera.  As she did this she asked the students what they saw. Other than saying it was “sparkly,” they didn’t have much to say. As Patti began to ask questions, such as, “What do you see on the sides?” and “What shapes do you see?” close reading became more concrete for her second graders. The questions allowed her to say, “Look how much more we SAW and learned about this ring because we took the time to look carefully!” Of course, she and students wondered what would happen if they read books in the same way.

Next, Patti and her students tackled the informational text Give Me a Sign, Helen Keller.  While she didn’t share the questions and lenses that they used to investigate this text, she did say that each student had a copy of the passage and “each day we reread it looking for answers and information and evidence.  Well, they LOVED it! They want to do more! I think it made them feel smart!”

Patti’s story brings into focus two important ideas:
1. If we are to give young children access to big concepts like “close reading,” we will need to make it concrete for them, just as Patti did when she placed her engagement ring under the document camera.  We will need to help them to see the value of looking again and again and again.

2. The idea that reading again and again makes children feel smart is important. For so many children, reading is an exercise in futility. They read with the expectation that they should understand and when they don’t, it makes them feel bad about themselves, or worse, dumb,  which makes them shut down, start to avoid reading, or proclaim that “reading is boring!”  Repeatedly going back to a text models the messy process of making meaning. It helps children see that there’s lots that we don’t get when we read something the first time. It shows children how the work of meaning making is hard yet gratifying. By casting reading in this light, we position children to embrace the hard work required to understand deeply.

Patti’s story made us wonder what other people have discovered as they’ve worked to read text closely. What lessons have you taught to make the concept of close reading accessible to students?

A Case for Reading Volume: Independent Reading (Blog Digest, Part 1)

This week we are assembling digests of some of the prominent themes across the last ten months of blogging. Over the next three days, we will look at three aspects of independent reading: volume, text choice/type, and nurturing passion. We hope that, for those of you who haven’t been with us from the beginning of this blog, this series of digests gives you a broad sense of the way we think about literacy instruction in general and the Common Core in particular.

Yoga, Piano Lessons, and Culinary Skills
This post puts reading practice into an analogous context, yoga, and explores the relationship between practice and improvement. How do you get better at yoga or piano if you never practice?  While educators need to be relentless about asking how much are kids actually reading, we have to remember that we don’t get better at anything (and we have no hope of becoming independent and proficient) unless we practice!

Does it really say that?
Beware of what you think the CC says! There are a number of places in the Common Core State Standards proper and in supporting documents that articulate that practice is critical to achieving the goals laid out by the standards.

The following blog series connects to Malcolm Gladwell and his references to the 10,000 hour rule. These posts begin to look at the standards themselves and they point out places where the CCSS do and don’t honor practice. These posts generally conclude that the authors of the standards probably should have been a bit more explicit but most certainly did imply that reading volume/a lot is important.
How Does the Common Core Honor Practice? (Part 1)
How Do the Common Core Reading Standards Honor Practice? (Part 2)
How Do the Common Core Reading Standards Honor Practice? (Part 3)

The Balance Between Literary and Informational Text: Is it Enough?
While this starts out as a post about reading diet and ensuring that students read a balance of literary and informational text, it is really about reading volume.  The big idea: How much time are kids actually reading?

Anchor Standard 10 Begs Another Question: What Does it Mean to Read “Independently and Proficiently?” (Part 1)  
This blog offers tips for making sure that students reach the goal of reading volume and thereby the loftier goals of independence and proficiency.

5 Things to Keep In Mind As You Implement the Common Core

We field many questions about interpreting and implementing the Common Core, but very often, people will say, “Sum it up.  What do we really need to know about the new standards for English Language Arts?” While distilling a complex document such as the Common Core is not an easy task, these five ideas may help you to further your understanding of the standards and the ways they impact teaching and learning.

 1.      Common Core instruction means repeatedly addressing all 32 standards.

The 32 standards for English Language Arts are distinguished by subtle differences.   What you see presented in reading is often echoed in the writing, speaking and listening, and language standards.  Alignment is no longer a simple process of picking a standard, teaching a lesson that addresses it, and ticking it off a list. Aligning instruction to the Common Core means planning lessons that address several standards on a repeated basis.

2.      Text selection is king.

Reading standard 10 speaks to the need for students to read “complex literary and informational text independently and proficiently.” Proficiency is incumbent upon one’s ability to deeply comprehend what they are reading. In order to practice deep comprehension, children need to be working with texts that give them a lot to think about. If we are not intentional about the materials that we select for our students to work within guided reading, shared reading, and read aloud, then we minimize their opportunities to work toward the goal of proficiency.

3.      Be an informed consumer.

Lots of companies are looking to profit from the Common Core. There are all sorts of new products flooding the educational materials market. Some of these products are good and reflect the spirit of the Common Core while others contain little substance.  The only way to know whether a resource is good or not, is to know what the Common Core says.  Be very cautious of buying your way to standards alignment because, very likely, it won’t work.

4.      Collaboration is as important for teachers as it is for students.

We are all smarter together than we are alone. When planning Common Core aligned lessons, we must include lots of opportunities for students to work together to build one another’s knowledge base.  These opportunities help to integrate many of the standards for speaking and listening as well as to serve the need for students to build background knowledge necessary for critical thinking. Like our students who are working to learn new material, the Common Core is new for us, which means that our instructional planning will be better if we work together with colleagues or more knowledgeable professionals to garner feedback about our lesson plans.

5.      Keep your eye on the big picture.  We went into teaching to instill and nurture a love for learning.

In spite of whatever reform initiative is set before us, our number one objective is student learning. We must remember that we didn’t enter into teaching because we thought we’d be the best person to help a child get a four on a test, we did it because we believe in helping children be the best they can be.  If, in implementing the Common Core, it seems like we are deflating a love of learning, we can’t possibly be on the right course.  When that happens, we must step back and rethink and reinvent our approaches.  Remember, there is no one clear path to implementation.  The only right path is the one that is best for the students that you teach.

Corporate Learning and the Common Core

For those of you who cut your teaching teeth on Don Holdaway’s books about shared reading as we did, perhaps you remember the term “corporate learning.” In the context of Holdaway’s work, the term corporate refers to a group of students reading and learning together (See definition 3, although we appreciate the irony of the term in the context of the corporate fingerprints on the development of the Common Core State Standards.).

Holdaway’s research on shared reading connected most strongly with shared reading as most of us imagine it, in early elementary classrooms with “big books.” But Janet Allen’s book On the Same Page (Stenhouse Publishers, 2002) takes a much more comprehensive view of shared reading and offers substantive instructional advice for teachers of students who have long graduated from kindergarten. In fact, we would argue On the Same Page has something for teachers of the Common Core Standards (or not), any subject, through grade 12.

While there are more and more books on the market with labels detailing their connections to the Common Core, we think you should be sure your Common Core library includes this immense resource. While On the Same Page addresses almost all aspects of the Common Core in ways that are practical and clear, we hit on three highlights.

1. Getting students excited about books. Text selection is at the heart of planning instruction that is aligned to the Common Core State Standards and it is the backbone of On the Same Page. Perhaps, the strongest advantage of the Common Core over NCLB and state-level standards is a move from discrete skill instruction to reading books to understand them. This is a tremendous opportunity, and teachers are finding that helping students fall in love with books again actually helps them comprehend better. Allen’s text is full of suggestions for helping students find books that are interesting enough to help readers find the stamina and motivation to figure out what they mean.

2. Working to support students in complex texts. Allen offers a host of specific strategies for supporting students as they work through challenging texts. Her strategies support student agency and independence and move beyond the usual routines of pre-processing the text for students and doling it out one explicit spoonful at a time. Allen’s focus is on understanding the text deeply and on student independence. Sound common core-ishly familiar?

3. Teaching students to navigate informational texts. Whether you are working with elementary students in informational trade books or middle school students in a history textbook, Janet Allen has strategies that can make your students’ interactions with non-fiction lead to more, actual learning. She is relentless in her shared emphases on engaging texts, reading for understanding, and student independence, and she ably applies these agendas to instruction in non-narrative text structures.

On the Same Page is just shy of an encyclopedic handling of shared reading, with the added benefit of extensive and varied instructional strategies accompanied by student artifacts and fabulous text recommendations. What is most compelling, however, about Allen’s Common Core messages of text selection, text complexity, reading for deep understanding, and student independence is that she has been writing and speaking about “Common Core” strategies since long before the Common Core Standards were a twinkle in any corporate eye.

 

Weekend Round-Up: September 8

Monday

“Happy” Labor Day

In today’s post, we wish our readers a happy holiday and refer them to Shawn Achor’s TED talk entitled “The Happy Secret to Better Work.”

Tuesday

Textual Straits: Exploring Informational and Literary Genre Requirements

The journey we are taking to understand the Common Core can be both challenging and confusing. For a bit of a change, we present our ideas about trudging this rugged terrain in narrative.  Happy reading!

Wednesday

Information and Stories as Co-Teachers (Part 1)

In this post, we explore the difference between comprehending information versus truly understanding it.  We consider what will best support children in their efforts to make meaning when reading and settle on using a mix of narrative and informational text to build their knowledge.

 

Thursday

Information and Stories as Co-Teachers (Part 2)

In this post, we look at the virtues of naturally building background knowledge by presenting children with texts, both fiction and non-fiction, around a theme.

Friday

Friday Favorites: Narrative and the Business World

To round out our week of posts dedicated to exploring the balance between literary and informational text, we refer you back to an earlier post titled Narrative and the Business World.

 

Favorite Articles

Two Common Core Blunders to Avoid and How to Do It 

On the Shoulders of Giants blogger Ariel Sacks writes about the informational-literary text split at the middle school and high school levels.  She points out how some people have misinterpreted and over-generalized the intended meaning of this Common Core directive.

Friday Favorites: Narrative and the Business World

This week we have explored the balance between literary and informational text which is required by the Common Core State Standards. We suggest that things are not as categorical or clearly defined as the Common Core authors seem to suggest. As our Friday Favorite for today, we invite you to revisit Narrative and the Business World, which explores the role that stories play in college and career lives.

If in doubt, watch this video of David Coleman’s presentation Bringing the Common Core to Life. He opens with a personal narrative … “But if you don’t mind, I thought I might begin on a slightly more personal note.  I grew up in New York City.  I went to public school there.  I went to PS 41, IS 70 and, yes, the old Stuyvesant building.”

Information and Stories as Co-Teachers (Part 1)

Jan’s fourth-grade son, Natie, recently informed her that 450,000 people died during the Revolutionary War. He is working through a stack of informational texts about African-American patriots during the Revolutionary War and is brimming with facts. While he is full of information that he technically comprehends, he doesn’t seem to understand much of it.

Jan told her husband that they should get him the book How Much is a Million? so that Natie could get a sense of just how many people died during the Revolutionary War. Her husband wisely suggested instead that they get him a book that offers a narrative account of one family’s loss of a son, father, or brother. While Natie may not have a sense of how many 450,000 really is, the fact that he doesn’t have a sense of what one loss is in this context is more at issue. He could write a good report, but his learning is shallow. After reading and acquiring so much discrete information about the Revolutionary War, however, he is poised to comprehend a story of the war in deep ways. Narrative (including literary and informational) offers Natie new opportunities to make connections between the texts he is reading. The reciprocal can be true as well. Reading stories about historical events or scientific concepts can arouse interest in gathering more information, such as our reading of Annie Dillard’s essay on Arctic explorers, which prompted yesterday’s post.

Narrative has long been a staple of elementary classroom instruction. It is the backbone of the fiction reading in classrooms and the favored structure for non-fiction text reading. Over the last ten years, however, there has been increasing instructional attention dedicated to reading and writing informational text, which is largely texts that explain concepts, teach information explicitly, or detail procedures. With its focus on “college and career readiness,” the CCSS formalizes informational/literary instructional variety and requires a 50/50 split in elementary schools, and we don’t think this is a bad idea.

For schools that were already thinking deeply about informational texts, a common strategy is to engage in a genre study and immerse students in a single type of text in order to study its features and practice writing in that genre. While there are substantive benefits to going deep with a particular genre, we also suggest a more integrated option: Reading informational and narrative texts about a single topic.

Pairing informational and narrative text is not a new idea, but reading the informational text in order to intentionally build understanding of the narrative text, or vice versa, is a bit of a spin-off on an older idea. We have been experimenting with this method of piggybacking informational and narrative text, and student response has been powerful.

For example, you might engage students in a shared reading of a passage from We’ve Got a Job: The 1963 Birmingham Children’s March and and then discuss with them possible reasons this historic event is overlooked. Then you might read aloud the picture book Sit-in by Andrea Davis Pinkney. Or you might engage students in a shared reading of this text presenting scientific information about flies before reading aloud the short story “Licked” from Covered With Nails and Other Stories that Will Shock Your Socks Off by Paul Jennings. It is hilarious, and doubly so if you read the scientific information first! (Note: The full story is in On the Same Page: Shared Reading Beyond the Primary Grades by Janet Allen, which is where we discovered it.)

Continued tomorrow!

(c) 2012-2013 Burkins and Yaris. All Rights Reserved